The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) is a 20-item, self-administered questionnaire that measures difficulty in identifying and describing emotions, which is a big part of alexithymia.
Basic information |
|
---|---|
Statements: | 20 |
Duration: | 5–10 minutes |
Type: | Screening tool |
Authors: | Michael Bagby, James D. A. Parker, Graeme J. Taylor |
Publishing year: | 1994 |
Seminal paper: | The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure (Bagby, Parker & Taylor, 1994) |
Take the test here:
Note
For information on how to interpret your test scores,
see the section entitled What does my score mean?
Who the test is designed for
- Adults (age 16+) of average or higher intelligence.
What it measures
The TAS-20 is one of the most commonly used measures of alexithymia.[1]Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) | ACBS It measures the following three factors:
Versions & translations
The English version of TAS-20 has been translated into 30+ different languages,[2]Twenty-five years with the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (Bagby, Parker, & Taylor, 2020) and there are many papers on the validity of translated versions of the test.[3]Psychometric Properties of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in the Chilean Population (González-Arias et al., 2018) Yet the test isn’t readily available online. Here are the few translations we have been able to find (in PDF-form, so not auto-scored):
Taking the test
The Toronto Alexithymia Scale consists of 20 items, giving you 5 choices for each item:
- Strongly disagree.
- Disagree.
- Neither agree nor disagree.
- Agree.
- Strongly agree.
Scoring
Basics
- Scoring range: 20–100 (higher scores indicate greater impairment/challenges).
- Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree).
- Five of the items are reverse-scored: 4, 5, 10, 18, and 19.
The total alexithymia score is the sum of responses to all 20 items, while the score for each subscale factor is the sum of the responses to that subscale.
Subscales
The TAS-20 has 3 subscales:
Your highest average subtype score indicates what part of alexithymia you have the greatest challenge with.
Interpretation
The TAS-20 uses cutoff scoring:
Validity
The 3-factor structure of the TAS-20 was found to be theoretically congruent with the alexithymia construct, and research using the TAS-20 demonstrates adequate levels of convergent and concurrent validity. The TAS-20 also demonstrates good internal consistency and test-retest reliability.[4]The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure (Bagby, Parker & Taylor, 1994)
In addition, the TAS-20 has been found to be stable and replicable across clinical and non-clinical populations. However, there was a small but statistically significant difference between the mean TAS-20 scores for men (51.14) and women (48.99).[5]The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure (Bagby, Parker & Taylor, 1994)
Limitations
Some question whether self-report scales such as the TAS-20 can adequately assess alexithymia in individuals where alexithymia is high, as they may be unable to evaluate their awareness of emotional feelings accurately.[6]Are alexithymia, ambivalence over emotional expression, and social insecurity overlapping constructs? (Müller, Bühner, & Şahinc, 2008)[7]Sociodemographic correlates of alexithymia (Lane, Sechrest, & Riedel, 1998) This limitation was also acknowledged by the authors in 1997.[8]Disorders of affect regulation: Alexithymia in medical and psychiatric illness (Taylor, Bagby, & Parker, 1997)
Based on the idea that a multimethod approach may be able to assess alexithymia more accurately, the authors of the TAS-20 also developed a structured interview method based on the TAS-20, called the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia (TSIA).[9]The Development of the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia: Item Selection, Factor Structure, Reliability and Concurrent Validity (Bagby, Taylor, Parker, & Dickens, 2006)[10]Twenty-five years with the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (Bagby, Parker, & Taylor, 2020)
Discussion
Dr. Natalie Engelbrecht:
I score 48, which means I do not have alexithymia. I used to have severe alexithymia, but have worked very hard through therapy to overcome it. Why? Well, because many of the challenges us autistics have come from alexithymia, rather than autism.
- Empathy: Alexithymia, not autism, causes reduced affective empathy. As autistic people, our intrinsic empathetic accuracy is superior.
- Eye contact: Autistic people avoid eye contact when overstimulated, while alexithymic people avoid eye contact due to negative emotions.
- Emotion recognition: Autism was unrelated to facial expression recognition ability, regardless of the extent of autistic traits. Problems with identifying facial expressions are seen only in alexithymia.
- Affect display: Reduced facial expressions in alexithymia constitute a defense mechanism against negative affect.
I would say that many of the challenges associated with my alexithymia have reduced, making my life much better. I am happier.
In terms of the TAS-20, I like that it is short and quick to take. However, I wish that a 7-point Likert scale was used instead of a 5-point scale. Going from agree or disagree to neither agree nor disagree is too significant a jump for myself. I would like to see slightly agree and slightly disagree included.
Kendall:
The statements in the TAS-20 are clear and easily understood, though a few are difficult for me to answer. For example, number 10—Being in touch with emotions is essential. I agree intellectually and see the importance, but in practice, I don’t rely on the connection. So, how do I answer? The only way possible is (3) neither agree nor disagree, but it’s not altogether correct. Others are difficult because—I’m unsure how I feel about the statement! Some, I have no experience on which to base a response. That seems to be a lot of issues in only 20 statements, but the total Alexithymia score does appear to be accurate, in that it reflects the challenges I deal with.
TAS-20
Choose one response that best describes how each item applies to you:
Comments
Let us know what you think!