April 14, 2020

Online Alexithymia Questionnaire

Last updated on June 8, 2021

The Online Alexithymia Questionnaire (OAQ-G2)is a self-administered questionnaire to measure difficulty in identifying and describing emotions and feelings, and distinguishing among the accompanying bodily sensations.

Dr. Natalie’s rating: 5 stars for appropriate and respectful wording, 5 stars for clarity & lack of ambiguity, and 4 stars for testing accuracy.
*The test appears to be accurate, but has not been clinically tested for its validity. However, it is based on clinically validated instruments.

 

Take the test here:


Who the test is designed for

  • Adults with ASD level 1 or Asperger syndrome.
  • Adults with normal to high IQ (IQ >=80).

Research indicates that 40–65%[1]The validity of using self-reports to assess emotion regulation abilities in adults with autism spectrum disorder (Berthoz & Hill, 2005)[2]Brief report: cognitive processing of own emotions in individuals with autistic spectrum disorder and in their relatives (Hill et al., 2004) of autistic people have alexithymia—or even as high as 70%.[3]Measuring the effects of alexithymia on perception of emotional vocalizations in autistic spectrum disorder and typical development (Heaton, 2012)


Versions & translations

The OAQ has been translated into three languages:


Taking the test

The OAQ-G2 consists of 37 statements, giving you 5 choices for each statement:

  • Strongly Agree
  • Agree
  • Undecided
  • Disagree
  • Strongly Disagree

To get significant results, a participant needs to answer no more than a maximum of 17 questions as undecided.

You can take the test auto-scored or self-scoring:


Scoring

  • Scoring range: 0–185
  • Threshold score: 113
  • 95–112 = possible alexithymia
  • 94 or less = no alexithymia

Scoring is as follows:

  • Strongly Agree = 5
  • Agree = 4
  • Undecided = 3
  • Disagree = 2
  • Strongly Disagree = 1

Excepting questions 3, 7, 8, 23, and 32 which are inversely scored:

  • Strongly Agree = 1
  • Agree = 2
  • Undecided = 3
  • Disagree = 4
  • Strongly Disagree = 5

The overall score can offer a good indication of whether you have alexithymia. However, in some cases, you may get a relatively low score despite scoring high in some areas. Fortunately, the test gives more details, but you have to scroll down to theDetailed Results.


Validity

How reliable, accurate, valid, and up to date is the test?

Though the OAG-2 is not clinically validated, it is based on clinically validated instruments. Three problems of other alexithymic questionnaires such as the Bermond-Vorst or TAS-20 are addressed:

  1. Questions were changed to refer to a problem with ‘spontaneous’ or ‘unconscious’ imagination rather than conscious imagination.
  2. Alexithymic individuals often lack awareness of emotions, so the wording of questions has been changed to accommodate this.
  3. Access to alexithymia questionnaires was limited, so the OAG had to be a free testing instrument for the general public.

An illustration of Natalie pointing to the title ‘Discussion’.

Discussion

Natalie:

I found the OAQ  relatively easy to take.

Alexithymics’ emotional blindness does not allow them to necessarily be aware of what they are feeling. As a result, I took the test very carefully to assess the statements, knowing that I am not always effective at knowing what I am feeling. If a person does not have a good awareness of their inner mental and emotional world, it can skew the results. My own score of 83 means that I have very few alexithymic traits, and based on the threshold I have no alexithymia.

However, the breakdown reveals I can actually have high alexithymic traits for identifying feelings, which indeed I do. A tremendous challenge I’ve found in my personal therapy is how to answer the question: How does that make you feel? Another category that shows fairly high alexithymia for me is vicarious interpretation of feelings.

So despite my overall score saying I have almost no alexithymia, it is important to look at the breakdown to get a better understanding as to whether you do in fact have alexithymia in particular areas. This information can be very useful when it comes to self-insight and addressing potential issues or areas where you can grow.

The first time I took this test, I missed seeing theDetailed Results, as there is no indication that there are more results than your overall score.

 

Natalie’s alexithymia subscale scores, which show she has alexithymia.

Kendall:

The Online Alexithymia Test is quick, easy to understand, yet informative and helpful. With the choices graphically illustrated under each statement, it is not necessary to continually scroll to the top and refresh the choices. With each answer highlighted, it is simple to see where a statement has been skipped or missed. All are easily understood and voiced in such a way that I never answered undecided. The scoring has a breakout of 7 categories and the points for each, which makes it clear what areas you are likely to experience challenges.


Embrace Autism | Online Alexithymia Questionnaire | icon Test

Statement categories

The statements of the questionnaire can be divided into the following categories:

F1 — Difficulty identifying feelings
  • When asked which emotion I’m feeling, I frequently don’t know the answer.
  • I have puzzling physical sensations that even friends/acquaintances/others don’t understand.
  • When I am upset I find it difficult to identify the feelings causing it.
  • I sometimes experience confusing sensations in my body
  • I can’t identify feelings that I vaguely sense are going on inside of me.
  • When involved in difficult or turbulent relationships, I sometimes develop confusing physical symptoms.
F2 — Difficulty describing feelings
  • I’m unsure of which words to use when describing my feelings.
  • I can describe my emotions with ease.
  • Describing the feelings I have about other people is often difficult.
  • I get in a muddle when I try to describe how I feel about an important event.
F2b — Vicarious interpretation of feelings
  • I often ask other people what they would feel if in my personal situation (any situation), as this better helps me understand what to do.
  • I tend to rely on other people for interpreting the emotional details of personal/social events.
  • I like it when someone describes the feelings they experience under circumstances similar to my own, because this helps me see what my own feelings might be.
F3 — Externally-oriented thinking
  • I prefer to find out the emotional intricacies of my problems rather than just describe them in terms of practical facts.
  • You cannot functionally live your life without being aware of your deepest emotions.
  • I prefer doing physical activities with friends rather than discussing each others’ emotional experiences.
  • When helping others I prefer to assist with physical tasks rather than offering counsel about their feelings.
  • I find it useful to ponder on my feelings as much as the practical issues when setting my priorities.
  • I don’t like conversations in which more time is spent discussing emotional matters than daily activities because it detracts from my enjoyment.
  • I make decisions based on principles rather than gut feelings.
F4 — Restricted imaginative processes
  • When other people are hurt or upset, I have difficulty imagining what they are feeling.
  • People sometimes get upset with me, and I can’t imagine why.
  • I am not much of a daydreamer.
  • I don’t dream frequently, and when I do the dreams usually seem rather boring.
  • I use my imagination mainly for practical means, eg., like how to work out a problem or construct a useful idea or object.
  • My imagination is usually not spontaneous and surprising, but rather used/employed in a more controlled fashion.
  • My imagination is often spontaneous, unpredictable and involuntary.
F5 — Problematic interpersonal relationships
  • People tell me to describe my feelings more, as if I haven’t elaborated enough.
  • People tell me I don’t listen to their feelings properly, when in fact, I’m doing my utmost to understand what they saying!
  • I don’t like people’s constant assumptions that I should understand or guess their needs… its as if they want me to read their minds!
  • Friends have indicated, in one way or another, that I’m more in my head than in my heart.
  • Some people have told me I am cold or unresponsive to their needs.
  • People I’ve been in close relationships with have complained that I neglect them emotionally.
F5b — Sexual difficulties and disinterest
  • Sex as a recreational activity seems pointless.
  • I often get confused about what the other person wants from a sexual relationship.
  • I often feel incompetent, awkward, uncomfortable, or occasionally physically sick in sexual situations.
  • For me, sex is more a functional activity than it is an emotional one.

Recommended next steps

After the OAQ, consider taking one of the tests below.

Toronto Alexithymia Scale

Like the OAQ, it measures difficulty in identifying
and describing emotions and feelings.

Toronto Empathy Questionnaire

Measures your emotional ability to understand and respond to others.

CAT-Q

Measures camouflaging, and can account
for lower scores on other autism tests.

Online autism tests can play an essential role in the process of self-discovery, and may inform your decision to pursue a formal diagnosis. For a formal assessment, please see a knowledgeable medical professional trained in assessing autism.


An illustration of a clipboard with a checklist or assessment.

If you are looking for an autism assessment,
Dr. Natalie Engelbrecht can offer help!
You can find more information here:

Online autism assessments
This article
was written by:
dr-engelbrecht-and-kendall-jones

Dr. Natalie Engelbrecht RP ND is a dually licensed registered psychotherapist and naturopathic doctor, and a Canadian leader in trauma and PTSD, and she happens to be autistic; she got diagnosed at 48.

And not only does she happens to be autistic, but her autism plays a significant role in who she is as a doctor and how she interacts with her patients and clients.

Kendall Jones is a musician and sound engineer from Louisiana, with an affinity for both music and language. He was diagnosed late in life, at 61.

Comments

Let us know what you think!

A hand pointing down (an index symbol).
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most voted
Inline feedbacks
View all comments
3
0
We would love to hear your thoughts!x
()
x