The Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Y–BOCS) is a standardized rating scale with both clinician-administered and self-report versions available that measures obsessions and compulsions, and is considered the “gold standard” in the measurement of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) symptom severity and treatment response.[1]Measurement of risk-taking in obsessive-compulsive disorder (Steketee & Frost, 1994)[2] Dimensional structure of the Yale–Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y–BOCS) (Moritz et al., 2002)
Basic information |
|
---|---|
Questions: | 58-item checklist + 10 questions |
Duration: | 5–10 minutes |
Type: | Screening tool |
Author: | Wayne Goodman |
Publishing year: | 1989 |
Seminal papers: | The Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale Part I – Development, Use, and Reliability (Goodman et al., 1989)
The Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale Part II – Validity (Goodman et al., 1989) |
Take the test here:
Disclaimer
Please note that the language used in some standardized tests
is not gender-inclusive. In particular, language tends to be
binary and excludes non-binary and other genderqueer identities. We advocate for these tests to be updated and validated
by the authors.
In the meantime, we are ensuring that in other, non-standardized areas (e.g., interpretation of tests during assessment), we are using affirmative and inclusive language.
Who the test is designed for
- The Y–BOCS assessment is administered to adult participants ages 18–85.
Versions & translations
- The Y–BOCS is translated into over 20 languages
- CY–BOCS (ages 6–17)
- Y–BOCS-II *see updates below
Taking the test
The Y–BOCS consists of 10 statements, giving you 5 choices for each statement:
- No symptoms
- Few symptoms
- Some symptoms
- Many symptoms
- Severe symptoms
Scoring
- Scores range from 0 points (no symptoms) to 4 points (extreme symptoms)
- Total score is calculated by summing items 1 to 10
- Scoring range: 0–40
Score interpretation
There are 10 questions in the Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Y–BOCS) calculator intended to interpret symptoms over the past seven days.
Each answer is awarded a point from 0 for the least intensity to 4 for the highest severity, forming the total result at the end.
Two partial scores are given—one summing the scores of questions 1 to 5 (for obsessions) and the second summing the scores from items 6 to 10 (for compulsions).
- 0–7: none
- 8–15: mild
- 16–23: moderate
- 24–31: severe
- 32–40: extreme
Scoring methods
You can take the test using two methods of scoring:
- Automated-scoring.
- Self-scoring, if you want documentation of your answers.
Validity
How reliable, accurate, and valid is the Y-BOCS?
The Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale[3]The Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale Part I – Development, Use, and Reliability (Goodman et al., 1989)[4]The Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale Part II – Validity (Goodman et al., 1989) is considered the “gold standard” in the measurement of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) symptom severity and treatment response.[5]Measurement of risk-taking in obsessive-compulsive disorder (Steketee & Frost, 1994)[6]Dimensional structure of the Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Y–BOCS) (Moritz et al., 2002)
A study comprising four raters and 40 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder demonstrated excellent inter–rater veracity. A high degree of internal consistency is shown with Cronbach’s α coefficient. Based on the pretreatment assessment of 42 patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder, each item was frequently endorsed and measured across various severity ranges. These findings denote the Yale–Brown Scale as a reliable instrument for measuring the degree of severity and types of symptoms associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder.[7]The Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale Part I – Development, Use, and Reliability (Goodman et al., 1989)
Studies indicate that the Yale-Brown Scale is a valid instrument for assessing symptom severity and outcome measures in drug trials.[8]The Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale Part II – Validity (Goodman et al., 1989)
Updates
The Y–BOCS was updated to the Y–BOCS II in 2004. The most noteworthy changes are:
- The phrase “resistance against obsessions” (item #4) is replaced by “obsession-free interval”.
- Scoring of all items expanded from 5-point (0–4) to 6-point (0–5) response scales so that the upper limit on the total Y–BOCS-II (sum of items #1–10) is now equal to 50 instead of 40.
- Assessment of avoidance behaviors is given added emphasis as reflected in the instructions and anchor points for most items.
- Extensive modifications are made to the content and format of the Symptom Checklist.
- Fine-tuning of wording or format.
*Although the Y–BOCS-II offers many improvements, the original version remains widely available online. As far as automated scoring availability, the Y–BOCS is, by all appearances, exclusively used.
Discussion
Natalie:
- My score: Obsessions subtotal = 5; Compulsions subtotal = 1; Yale–Brown obsessive–compulsive Scale (Y–BOCS) Total Score = 6.
- Interpretation: This score is indicative of a sub-clinical level of obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Back in 2020, Eva scored 40 (which is the highest possible score). It is interesting because Eva and Kendall laughed at the statements, ‘I completely and willingly yield to all obsessions’ and ‘I completely and willingly yield to all compulsions.’ They both said before taking the test, ‘Who completely yields?’ They both fully admitted they give into all their obsessions and compulsions.
I tend to choose friends with an OCD work ethic because I have high standards for good quality. It helps when they check and recheck my work and ask questions to ensure the details are complete. This website would not look this way if Eva and Kendall did not completely and freely yield fully to their special interest obsessions. So again, here we see where variant neurology is not necessarily negative.
The research shows that autistics do not resist their obsessions and compulsions[9]Children’s Yale–Brown obsessive–compulsive scale in autism spectrum disorder: component structure and correlates of symptom checklist (Scahill et al., 2014)—in fact, it makes many of us feel bad when we do. My obsessive qualities come up in helping people and the people who are my special interests.
The two groups [individuals with primary OCD and autistics without intellectual disability] had similar frequencies of obsessive-compulsive symptoms, with only somatic obsessions symptoms, with only somatic obsessions and repeating rituals being more common in the OCD group. The OCD group had higher obsessive-compulsive symptom severity ratings. Still, up to 50% of the ASD group reported at least moderate levels of interference from their symptoms.
I arrange my life to fully engage in my obsessions—my son, best friend, and Eva. I spend time with them every day. When I can’t, that is when I have significant distress and interference in my day. So why do I score subclinically? When I took the test, thinking about not having access to the three of them, my score was very different: Obsessions subtotal = 17; Compulsions subtotal = 18; Yale-Brown obsessive–compulsive Scale (Y–BOCS) Total Score = 35. Interpretation: This score is indicative of an extreme level of obsessive-compulsive disorder being present in the evaluated patient.
So it comes back to the fact that females engage in socially acceptable special interests while males do not. So while most of my special interests (psychology, autism) don’t distress me, my obsessions can cause significant distress if I can not engage in them.
Conclusion: Obsessions and compulsions are common in adults with ASD Level 1 autism and are associated with significant levels of distress (if we can not engage in them fully.)
Eva:
- My score: Obsessions subtotal = 7; Compulsions subtotal = 14; Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Y–BOCS) Total Score = 21.
- Interpretation: This score is indicative of a moderate level of obsessive-compulsive disorder being present in the evaluated patient.
I don’t expect this to be very accurate when self-administered, because you will first have to make a subjective consideration of what constitutes obsessive thoughts in the first place. Based on that, the very first question (How much of your time is occupied by obsessive thoughts?) already gives me pause. How do I answer this? I genuinely don’t know. I spend a lot of my time on very particular things, and cognitive processes are certainly involved in that. But do they constitute obsessive thoughts? I have no clue! But this first question is crucial when it comes to answering any of the questions that follow. On item #2 I’m confronted with the question of whether my obsessive thoughts cause interference with functioning in my social, work, or other roles. But whether or not that applies—and to what extent—depends entirely on what I consider to be obsessive thoughts in the first place! I would also say that I work in a field where my obsessive nature actually contributes to my output, so I can’t necessarily say it interferes—even if I do have a lot of obsessive thoughts.
Item #6 also puzzles me; what does it mean to ‘perform’ my obsessive thoughts? I suppose it’s getting at whether my obsessive thoughts lead to compulsive behaviors, but I’m not entirely sure if that’s how I ought to interpret it.
In Natalie’s discussion you might have read that I scored a maximum of 40 points in 2020. I believe I’m less obsessive–compulsive than I was back then, but I still struggle with certain compulsions. But both because I’ve changed over the years as well as my subjective interpretation of the test, I now score significantly lower. What troubles me about that is that I don’t know to what extent the lower score is due to my interpretation.
Kendall:
Am I conscientious and thorough in my work? Or do I possess a severe level of obsessive-compulsive disorder? I can’t say that I recall hearing the phrase, severely conscientious. Moving along. The response options are sometimes amusing; for example—completely and willingly yield to all obsessions. However, in considering the description of common obsessions:
- Excessive fears of contamination.
- Recurring doubts about danger.
- Extreme concern with order, symmetry, or exactness.
- Fear of losing important things.
I had no choice but to make that selection, plus other similar responses. The test is quick and easy. The questions are straightforward, with the response options uncomplicated.
To read more on alexithymia and aspects of this construct that are commonly mistaken for autism, have a look at:
Comments
Let us know what you think!