The AQ-10 Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ-10) is a quick questionnaire that primary care practitioners can use to see if a person should be referred for an autism assessment.
Basic information |
|
|---|---|
| Statements: | 10 |
| Duration: | 2–5 minutes |
| Type: | Brief screening tool |
| Authors: | Carrie Allison, Bonnie Auyeung & Simon Baron-Cohen |
| Publishing year: | 2012 |
| Seminal Paper: | Toward Brief “Red Flags” for Autism Screening: The Short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the Short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 Cases and 3,000 Controls (Allison, Auyeng, & Baron-Cohen, 2012) |
Take the test here:
This test is free, anonymous, and requires
no email sign-up for the results
Who the test is designed for
- Adults (age 16+) with suspected autism who do not have a learning disability.[1]Toward Brief “Red Flags” for Autism Screening: The Short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the Short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 Cases and 3,000 Controls (Allison, Auyeng, & Baron-Cohen, 2012)
Versions & translations
The AQ-10 is available in the following languages:
Taking the test
The AQ-10 consists of 10 statements, giving you 4 choices for each statement:
- Definitely agree
- Slightly agree
- Slightly disagree
- Definitely disagree
Note: it makes no difference to your score whether you choose slightly or definitely, so just treat the statements as a binary choice of ‘agree’ and ‘disagree’.
Scoring
- Scoring range: 0–10
- Threshold score: 6↑
- 6+ you might be autistic
- <6 you may not be autistic
- 80% of people designated Asperger’s syndrome score 6 or higher
The AQ-10 is only available as a self-scoring test.
Validity
How reliable, accurate, valid, and up to date is the test?
- The AQ-10 retains the predictive validity of the full 50-item inventory.[5]Toward Brief “Red Flags” for Autism Screening: The Short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the Short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 Cases and 3,000 Controls (Allison, Auyeng, & Baron-Cohen, 2012)
- The AQ-10 is thus a valuable instrument for rapidly quantifying where any given individual is situated on the continuum from autism to normality.
Discussion
Ember:
- Like many other autistics, I find it frustrating that 4 choices are offered while it’s scored in a binary way, as I feel that it wastes my time debating between slightly and definitely.
- I think the test also requires a certain amount of insight into oneself that alexithymia may prevent. The first time I took this test, I scored less than 6, and it was only when Eva went through the test with me and pointed out things that were obvious to her, that I realized that I indeed scored higher.
- If you have trouble answering because you are unable to identify or describe your emotions, it could make sense to take one of the alexithymia tests.
- The CAT-Q may be a good next test to take if you do not score above the threshold, as your propensity to mask/camouflage can result in lower scores. You should also answer the test based on how you truly feel and think, rather than based on how you present with significant camouflaging.
Kendall:
- If it makes no difference in the scoring, why create indecision with unnecessary choices? Omitting an undecided or don’t know option is a welcome design.
- Statements such as, When I’m reading a story I find it difficult to work out the characters’ intentions, are next to impossible for me to answer. Whether difficult or easy, is something I have no way to compare or contrast.
- That said, the questionnaire is quick to take, easily understood, and the scoring uncomplicated.
Comments
Let us know what you think!